Controversial Call: Della Maddalena Argues For Makhachev Over Rakhmonov

Admin

3 min read

Post on May 12, 2025

4.3

Share

Controversial Call: Della Maddalena Argues for Makhachev Over Rakhmonov – A Split Decision Sparks Debate

The UFC 294 main event saw Islam Makhachev successfully defend his lightweight title against Alexander Volkanovski, but the undercard delivered a fight that has ignited a firestorm of controversy: Khamzat Chimaev's dominant victory over Paulo Costa. While many hailed Chimaev's performance, the pre-fight discussion and subsequent analysis centered around a different, equally compelling matchup: Shavkat Rakhmonov's clash with Belal Muhammad. And amidst the post-fight analysis, renowned MMA commentator Joe Rogan's long-time partner, Dan "The Beast" Della Maddalena, has thrown a significant curveball, arguing that Islam Makhachev would have defeated Rakhmonov. This controversial assertion has sparked a heated debate within the MMA community.

Della Maddalena's Bold Claim: Makhachev's Superiority

Della Maddalena, known for his insightful commentary and deep understanding of the sport, believes Makhachev’s wrestling and grappling prowess would have proved insurmountable for Rakhmonov. In a recent podcast appearance, he stated, "Rakhmonov is a fantastic striker and has incredible potential, but Makhachev's wrestling is on another level. I think Islam would have controlled the fight on the ground, negating Rakhmonov's striking advantage." This opinion, while provocative, is not entirely without merit. Makhachev's relentless pressure and suffocating grappling style have proven incredibly effective against top-tier opponents.

Analyzing the Contenders: A Stylistic Clash

The hypothetical matchup between Makhachev and Rakhmonov presents a fascinating stylistic clash. Rakhmonov, known for his precise striking and devastating ground-and-pound, has showcased an impressive undefeated record in the UFC. His ability to seamlessly transition between striking and grappling makes him a formidable opponent for anyone. However, Makhachev's wrestling base and cardio are exceptional. He can consistently maintain pressure and wear down opponents, making it difficult for them to implement their game plan.

The Arguments For and Against Makhachev:

• Arguments for Makhachev: His superior wrestling and grappling, combined with his relentless pressure and exceptional cardio, would likely allow him to control the fight and limit Rakhmonov's striking opportunities.
• Arguments Against Makhachev: Rakhmonov's improved takedown defense and his potent striking could pose a challenge, potentially allowing him to land significant strikes and even secure a submission. The potential for an upset cannot be ignored.

The MMA Community Reacts: A Divided Opinion

Della Maddalena's statement has ignited a passionate debate amongst fans and analysts. While some agree with his assessment, citing Makhachev's dominance, others point to Rakhmonov's potential for an upset. The hypothetical nature of the matchup makes it difficult to definitively say who would win. Social media has become a battleground for passionate arguments, highlighting the intrigue and excitement surrounding this hypothetical clash of titans. Many fans are now calling for a future matchup between the two, creating a surge in demand for a potential superfight.

Conclusion: A Hypothetical Debate with Real Implications

Whether or not Della Maddalena's prediction is accurate remains to be seen. However, his controversial statement has reignited the conversation around Makhachev's place in the lightweight division and Rakhmonov's potential to rise to the top. This debate not only underscores the excitement surrounding these two elite fighters but also highlights the unpredictable nature of MMA and the endless possibilities within the sport. The hypothetical matchup between Makhachev and Rakhmonov serves as a compelling reminder of the talent and depth within the UFC's welterweight and lightweight divisions, leaving fans eagerly anticipating future matchups and potential clashes of styles.