Post-Match Analysis: Assessing Milan's New System After The Venezia Clash

Admin

3 min read

Post on Apr 28, 2025

4.8

Share

Post-Match Analysis: Assessing Milan's New System After the Venezia Clash

AC Milan's 2-1 victory against Venezia marked more than just three crucial points in their Serie A campaign; it offered a fascinating glimpse into Stefano Pioli's evolving tactical approach. The match wasn't a flawless performance, but it provided valuable data points to assess the effectiveness of Milan's new system and its potential for long-term success. This post-match analysis delves into the key aspects of the game, examining both the strengths and weaknesses of the Rossoneri's revamped strategy.

A Shift in Formation and Philosophy

Pioli opted for a departure from the traditional 4-2-3-1, experimenting with a more fluid 4-3-3 or even a 3-4-3 at times, depending on the flow of play. This tactical shift aimed to address several key issues: improving midfield control, offering more offensive width, and providing better support for the strikers. The change was noticeable, with players exhibiting more freedom and dynamic movement across the pitch.

• Increased Midfield Dominance: The three-man midfield, with players like Tonali, Bennacer, and Kessié (when he came on) rotating effectively, offered better control and distribution. This allowed Milan to dictate the tempo of the game more consistently than in previous matches.
• Enhanced Offensive Width: The deployment of wingers provided the much-needed width, stretching Venezia's defense and creating opportunities for crosses and cutbacks. This was a marked improvement on previous games where central play had become somewhat predictable.
• Improved Striker Support: The fluid nature of the formation meant that the strikers weren't isolated as often, with midfielders and wingers providing consistent support and creating more scoring chances.

Areas for Improvement: Defensive Vulnerability and Set-Piece Concerns

Despite the victory, the match also highlighted some areas requiring attention. Venezia, while ultimately defeated, caused Milan several problems, particularly from set-pieces and on the counter-attack.

• Defensive Vulnerability to Set-Pieces: Venezia's goal stemmed from a poorly defended corner, a recurring issue for Milan this season. Improving set-piece defending needs to be a priority for Pioli.
• Counter-Attack Susceptibility: Milan's high defensive line left them vulnerable to quick counter-attacks, forcing the defense into several last-ditch tackles. A more balanced approach, potentially involving deeper midfield cover, may be necessary to mitigate this risk.

Player Performances: Individual Brilliance and Tactical Adaptations

Several players delivered standout performances, showcasing their adaptability to the new system. Rafael Leão’s dynamism on the wing was particularly impressive, while Olivier Giroud’s aerial prowess and link-up play proved crucial in the final third. However, some players might require further time to fully integrate into the fluidity of the new formation. This is to be expected as the team transitions to a new style of play.

Conclusion: A Promising Start, But Work Remains

The Venezia game presented a promising first look at Milan's evolving tactical approach. The new system shows potential to address some of the team’s previous weaknesses and unlock greater offensive firepower. However, the defensive vulnerabilities highlighted during the match emphasize the need for continued work and adjustment. Pioli and his coaching staff will undoubtedly be analyzing the game's finer details to fine-tune the system and ensure consistency in future matches. The long-term success of this new strategy will depend on addressing the identified weaknesses and continuing to build on the promising foundation laid against Venezia. The coming weeks will be crucial in determining whether this tactical shift truly elevates AC Milan to the next level.