Tactical Test: Milan Vs. Venezia – Evaluating Pioli's New System

Admin

3 min read

Post on Apr 27, 2025

4.9

Share

Tactical Test: Milan vs. Venezia – Evaluating Pioli's New System

AC Milan's clash against Venezia offered more than just three points; it served as a crucial tactical test for Stefano Pioli's evolving system. The match, a 2-1 victory for the Rossoneri, provided a fascinating glimpse into Pioli's adjustments and hinted at both the strengths and weaknesses of his new approach. This tactical analysis dives deep into the key aspects of the game, evaluating the effectiveness of Pioli's strategy and its potential impact on Milan's season.

Pioli's Shifting Formation: From 4-2-3-1 to a Fluid 4-3-3

Pioli's decision to move away from the traditional 4-2-3-1, often deploying a more fluid 4-3-3, has been a key talking point. Against Venezia, this fluidity was evident. While the base formation remained a 4-3-3, the midfield trio – often featuring Tonali, Bennacer, and Saelemaekers – dynamically shifted positions, creating overloads in different areas of the pitch. This adaptability proved crucial in breaking down Venezia's compact defense.

• Increased Midfield Dominance: The fluidity allowed Milan to control the midfield better, dictating the tempo and disrupting Venezia's attempts to build from the back. Tonali's presence, in particular, was vital in winning back possession and initiating attacks.
• Width and Penetration: The wider positioning of the midfielders, particularly Saelemaekers, provided width and stretched Venezia's defensive line, creating space for central runners like Leao and Giroud.
• Weaknesses Exposed: While the fluidity offered advantages, it also exposed vulnerabilities. At times, the midfield lacked the necessary defensive solidity, leaving gaps that Venezia could exploit on the counter.

The Leao-Giroud Partnership: A Striking Success?

The partnership between Rafael Leao and Olivier Giroud has been a source of debate. Against Venezia, the duo showcased their potential, complementing each other's strengths. Leao’s pace and dribbling ability stretched the defense, while Giroud’s physical presence created space and provided a focal point for attacks.

• Synergistic Play: Their interplay was often fluid and effective, with Leao's runs creating openings for Giroud, and Giroud's hold-up play freeing up space for Leao.
• Areas for Improvement: However, consistency remains an issue. While moments of brilliance were evident, there were also periods where the connection lacked sharpness and coordination.

Defensive Concerns and Areas for Refinement

Despite the win, Milan's defensive performance wasn't flawless. Venezia managed to create several chances, highlighting areas where Pioli needs to address improvements.

• Vulnerability to Counter-Attacks: The aforementioned midfield gaps allowed Venezia to launch dangerous counter-attacks, exposing the defensive line’s vulnerability when stretched.
• Set-Piece Fragility: Milan's vulnerability on set-pieces is a recurring theme, and Venezia almost capitalized on this weakness. Pioli needs to address the team's set-piece defending.

Conclusion: A Promising Start, But Room for Growth

The Milan vs. Venezia match provided a valuable insight into Pioli’s evolving tactical approach. The fluidity of the 4-3-3 offered clear benefits, enhancing midfield control and creating opportunities. However, defensive solidity and consistency in the attack remain key areas for improvement. While the win against Venezia is encouraging, the true test will come against tougher opponents. The evolution of this new system will be a fascinating narrative to follow throughout the season. The coming weeks will reveal whether Pioli's tactical experiment is a resounding success or requires further refinement.